The analysis determined that both options had nearly identical installed cost on a per peak ton of capacity basis. The savings in annual operating cost were relatively small due to the local electrical rate structure. Therefore the cost savings did not justify the increase in energy consumption. From a master planning approach, the most significant factor was the limited space within the central plant and the difficulty of installing the required equipment for the thermal storage system while still leaving space for future expansion.
Colorado College decided that the new centrifugal chiller was the preferred option. They also preferred to convert the plant to a primary/secondary pumping system.